NASA, with the tampons.

  • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Still a pretty dumb approach by the NASA guys. Didn’t it occur to them to ask a woman - any woman - before coming up with the initial estimate? Like “hey Sally, how many tampons do you normally need during your period? OK we’ll triple that for a safety margin.” There. Done.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      They did ask her. Sure, they could have asked how many instead, but it probably came in a 100 count well within any significant mass margins, so they just asked if 100 would be enough.

      • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        it probably came in a 100 count

        A 100-count box seems like an absurdly large unit size. Are you doing the very thing that the anecdote is intended to highlight?

        • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Procurement for business/government/military (including and especially NASA), is very different than what you would see on a shelf at your local drug store.

          The drug store can’t buy a single box of tampons. They have to get an entire case of boxes of tampons. If each box is say, 20 tampons, and there’s more than 5 of those per case, then they’re buying at least 100 tampons so they can get a single box of them.

          There’s a lot of alternatives they could have looked into, like neighboring government institutions which may already stock them, asking them to supply a smaller quantity than they would have needed to order, or ordering outside of their typical channels and sending the intern down the road to buy a box from the nearest pharmacy… Those things wouldn’t really get accounted for in their budgeting though… So they would prefer to order through their normal distribution.

          It’s a funny comment to make to Ride, “is 100 enough?” And I’m sure everyone had a good chuckle.

          Regardless they probably didn’t see another good option for ordering other than to just buy a case of them and figure out the rest later.

          • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Don’t agencies have some kind of de minimis threshold for just running out to the store and buying basic stuff? I thought that’s why the DOGE freeze of government credit cards a few months ago was causing labs to cancel experiments and employees paying out of pocket to feed horses and working dogs.

            So the military does have a strict procurement process for rocket fuel, but they generally refuel their civilian vehicles (vans and such) with a government credit card at normal gas stations.

            At least that’s how I understand it.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          12 hours ago

          They definitely come in 100 counts. This part isn’t speculation. I have no Idea what NASA procurement looks like though, and I don’t have anyone to ask.

          • Zwiebel@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            It’s either super complicated and expensive tampons with certification or some employee being send to the nearest supermarket