Some years ago, I hosted my own matrix server for a few months. I’m an experienced self-hoster, but I remeber that Matrix was paticularly hard to host, requiring weird proxy rules, DNS adjustments, federation never worked reliably and push notifications never worked at all. I ditched the project soon because I also had no real use for it. However, I recently had some ideas where a Matrix server would be useful again. Has anyone attempted to install it recently and can tell me whether the situation has improved? Also, which server do you recommend? There still is synapse but I found it paticularly complicated to host. Dendrite is now archived and the current fork seems to be tuwunel which doesn’t seem to be under very active development.

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    If you want a conduwuit sucessor, I’d choose the continuwuity project over tuwunel. The legitimacy as the sucessor is mainly self-proclaimed, and continuwuity is a community effort. The entire thing is kind of a shitshow, though. If you want to do it like 99% of people, make friends with Synapse.

    I think what you describe still holds true. You need a few correct DNS entries and an open port. Once you want VoIP, some more ports and a TURN server will be necessary. And that one took me some effort, but the server itself (including federation) was well within my comfort zone. And I run continuwuity these days because Synapse wastes way too much resources for what I do and their other efforts went nowhere. But I’m not sure about the future of those smaller Matrix server projects.

    And if you don’t like Matrix or can’t get it to run, maybe try something like XMPP.

    • 0xD@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Why do you prefer continuwuity? Curious as I’m running tuwunel.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        We’ve had the discussion a while back here in selfhosted. You can find it here: https://awful.systems/post/5029223

        Main points: Continued drama around people, and tuwunel is tied to a single, (paid) developer and I figure once there’s anything wrong with that, tuwunel might die instantly. While continuwuity is a community effort and maybe that’s a bit more sustainable. Though I don’t own any crystal ball and I don’t know how things will turn out.

  • verstra@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    My matrix server is nearing 5 years old. I have federation disabled, because I don’t need that - we are using it as a family chat. sqlite database I’m using is now 2GB, but other than that it is working great.

    I do acknowledge that I’m not leveraging the things matrix is designed for (federation, e2e encryption), but to be honest, it’s not really good at that.

  • Samsy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I use conduit. And really happy with it. Since I use 3 bridges the compose.yml is a mess. It works really nice. The sliding feature boosts all media files. But there is always something broken or misconfigured. Actually my WhatsApp bridge blocks all mediafiles and I was too busy to fix it already.

    • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Conduit is long dead. Upgrade to tuwunnel, its successor, while its still binary compatible…

      All bridges works fine here.

      • Jade@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Continuwuity developer here - Conduit is reviving itself, and you can no longer move from Conduit to tuwunel or Continuwuity. You haven’t been able to for as long as either project has existed. You might be confusing conduwuit with Conduit.

  • cactus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    damn, was not expecting to see so much hate towards matrix.
    it sure was annoying to set up, but once I got it up the way I wanted, it kind of just worked from that moment on. I’ve had it for some 5 months now and it works as intended with no issues, aside from some small glitches here and there which get fixed very fast (on the mobile app).
    my use case was getting off Discord with a bunch of friends, so we needed a reliable way to have multiple chats, channels/rooms and good voice chat with screen sharing. element call does those well. my federation is of course also closed. for me e2ee is just a bonus
    I think that if that’s your use case, it’s good for that. synapse does seem a bit inefficient but I guess you can’t do much about it

    • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      My experience is the same as yours, but I think the people complaining are the ones who are federated and are in large communities. Matrix apparently doesnt handle large rooms very well.

  • underline960@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Damn. That sucks. (Edit: Referring to the comments saying Matrix is dead and dying.)

    I get that IRC and XMPP are more stable and built around federation from the ground up, but… they’re not Discord replacements.

    That was IMHO, the point of Matrix/Element.

    Tell me if I’m wrong, but a significant part of a network’s resilience is the number of nodes and users.

    Without a glowup or some kind of repackaging, IRC/XMPP are doomed to stay niche.

    • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Xmpp supports group chat, 1:1 messaging, you’ve got webtrc support for voice/video, and its extensible.

      Jingle even has screen sharing (and I think a WIP remote control function).

      What is missing from xmpp?

      • underline960@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Technically, nothing.

        In practice, who do you know that’s using it and doesn’t run Arch, by the way?


        My point isn’t that IRC/XMPP aren’t technically capable.

        It’s that they’re not designed for non-technical users.

        I want corporate social media to die. Mastodon and Piefed are far from killing the beast, but they’ve made the more progress than most projects have seen in a long time.

        I want corporate messaging to die. Matrix is far from killing the beast, but for a little while, at least it was trying.

  • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    IRC and XMPP are infinitely less painful, honestly, and both were designed around federation from the ground up, long before it was cool.

    • deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      IRC does not have any federation, and XMPP does it in a completely different way from Matrix that has unique pros and cons.

      IRC is designed for you to connect to a specific server, with an account on that server, to talk to other people on that server. There is no federation, you cannot talk to oftc from libera.chat. Alongside that, with mobile devices being so common, you’d need to get people to host their own bouncer, or host one for nearly everyone on your network.

      XMPP federation conceptually has one major difference compared to Matrix: XMPP rooms are owned by the server that created them, whereas Matrix rooms are equally “owned” by everyone participating in it, with the only deciding factor being which users have administrator permissions.

      This makes for better (and easier) scaling on XMPP, so rooms with 50k people isn’t that big of an issue for any users in that room. However, if the server owning the room goes down, the whole room is down, and nobody can chat. See Google Talk dropping XMPP federation after making a mess of most client and server implementations.

      On Matrix, scaling is a much bigger issue, as everyone connects with everyone else. Your single-person homeserver has to talk with every other homeserver you interact with. If you join a lot of big rooms, this adds up, and takes a lot of resources. However, when a homeserver goes down, only the people on that homeserver are affected, not the rooms. Just recently, matrix.org had some trouble with their database going down. Although it was a bit quieter than usual, I only properly noticed when it was explicitly mentioned in chat by someone else. My service was not interrupted, as I host my own homeserver.

      The Matrix method of federation definitely comes with some issues, some conceptually, and some from the implementation. However, a single entity cannot take down the federated Matrix network, even when taking down the most used homeservers. XMPP is effectively killed off by doing the same.

      • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        You’re absolutely incorrect about IRC. Would you like to learn? Open IRC federation is basically never used anymore and the few networks that exist are very stable (if not completely calcified), but it is a core feature of the design, and in the old days, massive interconnected networks of IRC servers like EFnet and Undernet spanned the globe, there were even some servers that allowed open federation (EFnet is actually named for it – eris-free-net referring to the last server “eris” that supported free federation), and at some points Netsplits were a frustratingly daily occurrence. Like with any federation, abuse is the reason we can’t really have nice things anymore, but IRC absolutely supports federation. Not very well from a modern standpoint since it didn’t really keep up with the abuse arms race, but when it was first conceived it was way ahead of its time.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          “Open IRC federation is basically never used anymore”

          so you admit IRC isn’t federated, lmfao

    • qtip@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I switched from IRC to matrix in 2018 specifically because I found mobile difficult.

      I used the suggestion in your linked document by running irssi in a tmux session on a VPS I paid for, then using a bridge to an app on my phone. I found the experience to be cumbersome even for someone like myself (and even then irssi required reboots or else it would lose performance over time).

      I wanted to use IRC for a family chat, but I couldn’t possibly convince my friends and family to go through the same client setup as I did.

      In my opinion there are use cases that either IRC or Matrix would be preferred over the other (not to mention other self hosted communication software).