You want me to explain the bloom filter? So that you can say “see, I told you it makes sense to use as a memory efficient guaranteed no false negative checks on if a user has seen a video before. Dumbass”.
Then I’d reply something like “yeah, I, know… The point isn’t whether or not bloom filters can make sense here… What’s being discussed is whether or not this was generated by a human or LLM… That, even if someone was making a diagram, of a system, where bloom filters was used, for the case of checking if you’ve already seen a video… It would still be weird to present it in the way it is presented in the diagram, for a human, but not so weird for an LLM, if you consider how LLMs work by associated concepts, where a ‘creator filter’ and ‘bloom filter’ are linguistically more connected, and explains why they are used similarly in the diagram, even though the latter is hardly considered a filter by anyone who has used one, not to mention that the actual ‘filter’ here would be the concept of ‘not/seen before’… and again, who’d want to give a shit about which data structure is used to most space-efficiently perform that evaluation… for fucks sake”
Then, you’ll be all non sequitur and accuse me of some ad hominem like “you use big words on purpose to seem smart, but you are dumb”.
I have to give credit where credits due, I appreciate you fast forwarding the conversation. Where you start to lose me is where you say who gives a shit about what data structure you use. Is it not important to use efficient filtering algorithms so data is streamed quickly? Just because you would not think to present it that way does not mean another human would not. I’m not going to call you an ad hominem, I am just literally confused at what your point is, and why you can’t just acknowledge the work by humans that was clearly put into this.
Lol, just keep dodging the questions, mr expert senior dev. Really convincing me of your expertise. 💩
You want me to explain the bloom filter? So that you can say “see, I told you it makes sense to use as a memory efficient guaranteed no false negative checks on if a user has seen a video before. Dumbass”.
Then I’d reply something like “yeah, I, know… The point isn’t whether or not bloom filters can make sense here… What’s being discussed is whether or not this was generated by a human or LLM… That, even if someone was making a diagram, of a system, where bloom filters was used, for the case of checking if you’ve already seen a video… It would still be weird to present it in the way it is presented in the diagram, for a human, but not so weird for an LLM, if you consider how LLMs work by associated concepts, where a ‘creator filter’ and ‘bloom filter’ are linguistically more connected, and explains why they are used similarly in the diagram, even though the latter is hardly considered a filter by anyone who has used one, not to mention that the actual ‘filter’ here would be the concept of ‘not/seen before’… and again, who’d want to give a shit about which data structure is used to most space-efficiently perform that evaluation… for fucks sake”
Then, you’ll be all non sequitur and accuse me of some ad hominem like “you use big words on purpose to seem smart, but you are dumb”.
I have to give credit where credits due, I appreciate you fast forwarding the conversation. Where you start to lose me is where you say who gives a shit about what data structure you use. Is it not important to use efficient filtering algorithms so data is streamed quickly? Just because you would not think to present it that way does not mean another human would not. I’m not going to call you an ad hominem, I am just literally confused at what your point is, and why you can’t just acknowledge the work by humans that was clearly put into this.