Does this community need a post every time there’s a new spam account?
eleijeep
- 1 Post
- 14 Comments
eleijeep@piefed.socialto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Locked out of GL.iNet admin panel after WireGuard route changeEnglish
1·8 days agoIs it now handing out IPs in a different subnet? Check the IP given to your client.
eleijeep@piefed.socialto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Cloudflare Tunnel: proxy-dns Command Removal 2026 | What are some nice alternatives to encrypted DNS?English
14·12 days agomy ISP was hijacking my DNS queries and changing it to their own DNS server
Which ISP? Name and shame!
eleijeep@piefed.socialto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•FediMeteo: How a tiny €4 FreeBSD VPS became a global weather service for thousandsEnglish
2·15 days agoSo if you use this and have a public follows list then someone can look at the accounts you follow and find out where you live.
Is that a smart idea?
eleijeep@piefed.socialto
Fediverse@piefed.social•Random idea: a federated alternative to Amazon Prime built from independent shops?English
3·20 days agoI know, I just don’t particularly want to dedicate part of my brain to understanding what they do. I’m sure there are non-fascist examples to take inspiration from.
eleijeep@piefed.socialto
Fediverse@piefed.social•Random idea: a federated alternative to Amazon Prime built from independent shops?English
4·20 days agoI have no idea how Shopify works. I hear they support fascism.
eleijeep@piefed.socialto
Fediverse@piefed.social•Random idea: a federated alternative to Amazon Prime built from independent shops?English
6·20 days agoProblem is that a shop probably doesn’t want to show you listings from their competitors, and price aggregators don’t want to share their listings with other price aggregators because they would lose their kickback if you buy from another referrer.
What you describe already exists in a non-federated way as these modern “marketplace” platforms like Amazon, where many third-party sellers can all list the same product at different prices and the platform aggregates all of the listings into one product page. Amazon is not the only site that does this.
If you had a federated protocol to implement this kind of marketplace, then you’d be adding an extra middleman to the transaction, because you’d need to compensate both the server that hosts the vendor’s listing and the server that showed that listing to the buyer. This might make prices higher for consumers or margins thinner for sellers.
I don’t think it’s impossible in theory but it would need some good business experience to pull off successfully. You’d basically be competing with all of the incumbent giants (Amazon) right off the bat.
eleijeep@piefed.socialto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Selfhosted - friendly ways to fight spam without email / sms verification?English
1·21 days agoWhat does hashwash mean? I googled it but I just get instructions on how to wash my hash.
eleijeep@piefed.socialto
Fediverse@piefed.social•Would blockchain work better for the Fediverse, instead of Email Style Instances?English
10·23 days agoBlockchain is a decentralized distributed-consensus protocol that uses proof-of-{work/stake} to prevent a Sybil attack (>50% malicious nodes) from taking control of the consensus algorithm.
To recap, blockchain gives you:
- decentralized
- distributed consensus
- with Sybil attack resistance
If you don’t need any one of those 3 attributes then you do not need blockchain.
For the Fediverse, only property 1 (decentralized) is required/desirable. 2 (distributed consensus) is not required since the architecture is Federated; that is, each server decides on it’s own set of available posts, comments and moderator actions, and chooses which of those things to show to users and to federate to other servers. Since property 2 is made redundant by federation, there is no risk of Sybil attack, so property 3 is also redundant.
If you actually wanted to have a decentralized distributed consensus algorithm to ensure that all posts/comments/etc. were replicated exactly across all servers then you could use a distributed consensus algorithm like Raft or Paxos. If you then also wanted to mitigate Sybil attacks on the network then you could simply use a whitelist of trusted peers, as each Fediverse server already uses for federation.
Only if you wanted a truly peer-to-peer decentralized distributed consensus protocol that is resistant to attack would you need to use a blockchain protocol. But, ask yourself why anyone would need such a consensus model when it would preclude localized moderation, “defederation” would result in hard forks of the ledger, and every action in the network would be publically visible for all time making post deletion (moderation) impossible.
Blockchain was invented for online currency where you actually need distributed consensus of a ledger in a Byzantine environment. It’s not really a model that is suitable for social media, messaging, publishing or any of the other applications that it has been shoe-horned into.
eleijeep@piefed.socialto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•Suggestions for Community OrganizingEnglish
2·25 days agoGet a job in pizza delivery, you’re sure to meet some interesting characters that way.
eleijeep@piefed.socialto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•Wafrn, a tumblr inspired federated social media that connects with fedi, lemmy and bluesky (optional)English
0·1 month agoWhat does the name mean?
eleijeep@piefed.socialto
Selfhosted@lemmy.world•MPV: The Ultimate Self-Hosted Media Solution You're Probably Sleeping OnEnglish
1·2 months agoYou wrote this shit with an LLM, didn’t you?


You need to look at the DNS server used by whatever client is resolving that name. If it’s going to an external recursive resolver instead of using your own internal DNS server then you could be leaking lookups to the wider internet.