It’s Pi Hole. Everything’s computer.

    • CatZoomies@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Thank you! Noted for next time! Saves me the trouble of having to use lasso to clean up the edges and feather any aliasing problems

      I got bamboozled when I was surfing the web at AltaVista and tried to download this transparent pi hole png logo. It was saved as PNG and had transparent in the name. Brought it into Krita and I chuckled, so figured I’d troll a few persons online and added the “pretend this is transparent” to the meme.

  • Magnum, P.I.@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Wow the PNG is so transparent I am impressed. I think I have never seen anything so transparent before. You guys really know how to make stuff transparent. The most transparent in the world. Every expert knows this is the most transparent transparency transpering.

  • Pilgrim89s@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Best solution for these concerns in my opinion is

    • TV for presentation in companies (often without smart apps)
    • PiHole for blocking the most adds
    • SHIELD for the apps, like YouTube without adds, stream apps, emulators, etc

    Works like a charm for me, I did not see adds for month, maybe years. With the shield, I use SmartTube because I can login and don’t have any adds. None. I also use an app for streaming (moonlight or something like that) to play my PC games on my tv with controller.

    • CatZoomies@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      How has SmartTube been for you? Is it an Android only or does it work on other platforms?

      I’ve been a FreeTube user for years, but YouTube’s aggressive countermeasures has mostly rendered this program unusable (I use on Linux). Devs put out fixes but they work for a handful of days before YouTube breaks it again.

    • CatZoomies@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It’s because it got saved as JPEG in the title. Idk some kind of weird Lemmy bug or something , this totally was legitimate PNG I swear on me mum

    • CatZoomies@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      LOL thanks bro. I was browsing the internet at AltaVista and downloaded a pi holo logo image that said transparent PNG in the name. When I added the image in Krita I had a good laugh and decided I’d leave it as is here

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    I have a smart TV. It is connected to two things. The wall socket for power and HDMI #2 for my PC.

    Edit: Also I have a PFSense router, I use PFBlockNG to also block the IPs behind the blocked DNS entries. My phone is GrapheneOS and all of my computers are GNU Linux. Any blocked incidents I get are usually from websites. If I surf the web a lot in a month, I maybe get 200 blocked incidents. If my normie friends stay over with, for example, a Windows PC and an iPhone, I get 2000 per day. It’s wild what’s going on with these devices.

  • einfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    17 hours ago

    At this point just use the TV as screen for a Raspberry and be done with it. Pi hole is good but it cant catch everything, and i would expect smart tv’s by now try to smuggle out data on things that can get around the pihole. Every Smart TV has to be assumed a compromised device, with advanced data exfiltration options.

  • Buying old TV (as long as LED) or 2K resolution TV is still worth it for me because i don’t like Android TV, Smart TV, or other crap and shits. For me a TV doesn’t need to have that kind of features, if you want android just buy android tv box like NVIDIA Shield or Minix

    • Prox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Couldn’t you just buy a new, awesome TV and then not hook it up to the internet?

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I set up my Samsung give it its initial update, and then blocked it from internet at my firewall. If I need it to do something I unblock it for a few minutes and then block it again when I’m done. I use streaming sticks for all my other work and they’re just pie holed regularly.

      • Randelung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It takes ages to boot, might have integrated offline ads, draws power when on standby for features you don’t want like remote controllability via network, and it’ll probably nag you forever to let it online. No thanks, a display will always just be that in this household. Separate concerns please, also easier to upgrade or replace.

      • Pope-King Joe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Many newer smart TVs will literally not boot up past a certain point until you connect them to the internet to “activate” them. It’s actual madness.

      • Final Remix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        That’s what I did with my brand new whatever-inch big fucking flatscreen. Like 80% of the buttons on the remote make a little notification come up saying the feature’s missing since the TV wasn’t set up “properly”, but it works fine.

    • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      And/or some weird legislation that mandates connecting them to your home network. Because you wouldn’t want them to not be able to phone home with the thousands of screenshots so their AI can verify that you are not stealing copyrighted content, right???!

            • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              I really hope that continues to be an option.

              I worry it’ll end up like trying to buy a car that doesn’t constantly report your location (physically disconnecting the cellular antenna is still legal for now) or living without a cellphone and only paying with cash. With enough time, any semblance of privacy becomes weird, then illegal.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I thought government regulation would prevent that? I thought the whole point of a Mac address was a unique id for hardware

        • Opisek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Unique IDs are a privacy concern. Best you can tell by randomized MAC addresses is who the manufacturer of the device is and the type of device if you’re lucky (like when the manufacturer’s departments are internally split into separate companies), but that’s not guaranteed.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      17 hours ago

      New TVs will connect to other smart TVs that have been connected to the Internet.

      You straight up have to pull their chips now if you really want to be sure.

      • rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        17 hours ago

        This is the first I’ve heard of such a thing. Like TVs connecting to one another through Wifi Direct or BTLE and tethering their internet connection? Can you link to anything discussing this?

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Hmm, I recall reading a couple articles about it a year or so ago but nothing is coming up in searches.

          I’m not sure if that means it was vaporware, misinformation, or coming soon to a Google TV near you. Anyone that’s more familiar with network capabilities is free to correct me, but as far as I’m aware if your TV even has Bluetooth it’s already capable of doing this at some level.

          Either way you’ll catch a smart appliance in my house when I’m dead.

      • Patches@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        ? If you’re going to block 1 Smart TV from the Internet. Why wouldn’t you do it to all the TVs on your LAN?

      • passepartout@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Probably because you should care about the fuckton of TVs being sold and in circulation with software that is just some of the worst privacy violations bundled together in a case behind a big LCD/OLED panel. There is no option to avoid it and probably no option to install something else on the hardware you bought and therefor should be yours to do whatever you want to with it. I even read that some connect to open wifi access points without passwords to reach the internet.

        • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Probably because you should care about the fuckton of TVs being sold and in circulation with software that is just some of the worst privacy violations bundled together in a case behind a big LCD/OLED panel.

          But that’s what I mean. I don’t use my TV as a smart TV, it’s plugged into a device where I can control the privacy settings via HDMI. No wifi, no apps being used, no connection to the outside world. That’s why I don’t care about DNS shenanigans with the TV, because I do them more comfortably on another device.

          • passepartout@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            You not caring about the implications because you can avoid it in your own home could have come across as not helpful to the greater cause I guess.

      • Novaling@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        We do a lot of streaming in my house unfortunately, mostly using Kodi to pirate anime. So it needs Wifi in our case. If I had some old (working) laptops and router around, I’d do a Pihole and VPN but alas.

        • rainwall@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Slap one of these under or behind your tv. Put pop-os Linux on it it. You can run pihole/Jellyfin/kodi off it at the same time. It will host your anime and index it with jellyfin, filter your entire network for ads, and give you kodi’s excellent interface.

          Jellyfin can grab metadata/subtitles/autoskip intros/on and on and has native kodi integration. It will run better on a beefer PC than the one above, but if youre just using it on 1 tv with kodi, you should be fine.

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I never plan on replacing my commercial display. when it breaks, i won’t care. don’t watch tv or movies anyways. it’s all garbage